Vaccination - 5 Things to think Before Vaccinating Your Children

One of the most leading decisions you will make
One of the most leading decisions you will make that will affect the condition of your children is either or not to vaccinate them. Since many medical authorities say vaccination is safe, most parents go ahead with vaccination, wholly unaware of the possible dangers and unable to identify serious reactions when they occur. I am a huge believer in parenting without regrets and I am writing this report to spur you to do some investigate on your own, especially since the information that you will be presented with (if any) by your pediatrician is not enough for you to make a truly informed choice. Regardless of either you decree to vaccinate your children or not, you should at least be making a aware and fully informed choice. The following is needful for you to think before vaccinating

Vaccinations are not necessarily safe - You need to be the judge for your family
The majority of pediatricians will tell you that vaccines are safe and that the amount of children that perceive adverse reactions is very low. In addition, they will lead you believe that the few negative reactions are determined tracked and monitored. However, if you take the time to dig deeper you will find that these assertions are not evidence based and lack solid scientific backing. For example, there has never been a long term study that compares the condition and welfare of vaccinated children to unvaccinated children. Seeing as cancer is the leading cause of death by disease for children under 15 years of age, wouldn't it be enthralling to know if the cancer rate for vaccinated kids was much higher than for unvaccinated kids?

Child Immunization Schedule

Might that change our view on the protection and wisdom of vaccination? There has been some analysis into the issue, but both of the studies have been discounted by the Centers for Disease control (Cdc). One study was of the Pennsylvania Amish, who don't vaccinate their children for religious reasons. When it was found that they have virtually no incidence of autism (nor of asthma, allergies or Adhd) the Cdc responded by saying that the Amish have a "genetic connectivity" that protects them. (Reference 1) A second study, this one of a home-schooling organization of 35,000 children in the Chicago area, found that in this unvaccinated group there were no recorded cases of autism and that the incidence of asthma, allergies and Adhd was extremely low as well. (Reference 2) This was also discounted.

Vaccines are not wholly tested before, nor adequately tracked after, being released
Vaccinations are not rigorously tested before being released to the public. Typically, a new vaccine is tested by comparing short term side effects of a new vaccine against an already existing vaccine. The definition of what constitutes a side ensue is narrowly defined so that many side effects are determined to be coincidence - not linked to the vaccination. It is also leading to know that the pharmaceutical associates have been absolved of liability for vaccine injuries since congress enacted the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. This leaves them with very exiguous incentive to do approved testing. For example, when a manufacturer's representative was asked in a 1997 Illinois Board of condition hearing to show evidence that the hepatitis B vaccine is safe for newborns, the representative stated, "We have none, our studies were done on 5 and 10 year-olds." (Reference 3) This is with regard to because your children are scheduled to receive three doses of Hep B before they are a year old, with the first dose being administered before you and your baby leave the hospital.

Since there is so exiguous testing prior to release, one would hope that there would be just tracking and follow-up after the vaccine has been released to the public so that if there were issues, they could be evaluated and the vaccine would be pulled from the store if necessary. Not so! It is true that when a vaccine is released into the market, post-marketing watch is supposed to track any negative reactions. However the adverse reporting system is entirely voluntary and according to David Kessler, (the head of the Fda for most of the 1990s), 90 to 99 percent of all adverse reactions are never reported. (Reference 4)

The composition of vaccinations currently required as part of the Recommended Immunization Schedule are fabulous for the immune systems of many children
Not only are private vaccines not rigorously tested, but the composition of vaccines prescribed in the Centers for Disease control "Recommended Immunization Schedule 2009" are not studied in composition to prove that giving complicated viral and bacterial vaccinations at one time is safe. Over the past twenty years, the amount of vaccinations children are given has roughly quadrupled. In 1983 children were given 5 shots during their first 6 months of life and 8 shots by the age of two. By 2007 that amount increased 74% to 19 shots by the age of 6 months and a whooping 27 by the time they are two years old. This is especially with regard to when you realize that children are born with adolescent immune systems as well as an inability to effectively metabolize heavy metals.

For the most part, mercury (Thimerosol) has been removed from vaccines. This doesn't mean that there are not other ingredients in vaccines that cause concern. One of these ingredients is aluminum which is added to vaccinations to growth their efficacy (help them work better). Why is aluminum a concern? Well, aluminum is eliminated primarily straight through the kidneys, when babies can't eliminate it effectively it accumulates and causes impaired neurologic and mental development that doesn't show up until colse to 18 months of age. Baby kidney function is low at birth and doesn't reach full capacity until 1-2 years of age. (Reference 5) As a result, the cumulative exposure babies have to aluminum (in the process of receiving up to 37 doses of vaccination delivered in 27 shots during their first two years of life) can cause numerous problems. For example, children typically receive eight vaccinations (Hepatitis B, Rotavirus, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Haemophilus Influenza Type B, Pneumococcal and Inactivated Poliovirus) on the same day when they are 2 months old.

The total amount of aluminum they are injected with is between 295 and 1225 micrograms, depending on which brands of vaccination are used. Meanwhile, the Fda requires that all injectable solutions have a 25 microgram limit. (Reference 6) Not only is the maximum aluminum exceeded at two months, but they are injected with nearly the same amount of aluminum at 4 months and again at 6 months, long before their kidneys are fully functioning and can eliminate the aluminum effectively. The combined amount of aluminum that builds up in their system will be dependent on their condition and genetics, and is likely many, many times the recommended limit. More to the point, nobody knows what the repercussions are for the millions of children that are being vaccinated as part of the recommended schedule.

Parents, not the government or pharmaceutical companies, take full responsibility for vaccine damage
If your child is injured by vaccination, you cannot sue the pharmaceutical company(s) that produced the vaccine(s). They have been protected from lawsuits by the Us government. Instead, you must submit your case to the Vaccine Injury compensation agenda (Vicp). To date, roughly 60 percent of the claims have been rejected. The problem with winning compensation is proving that the vaccine, not an unknown genetic problem or coincidence, caused the injury. Because your baby's immune system is complex, it is easy for them to say that it was something other than the vaccine that caused the problem. The whole process takes a long time, meaning that if your child is injured, you will likely wait years before you are awarded any money to defray the costs of raising a child with serious medical and caretaking needs. It is estimated that the lifetime cost of caring for one autistic child is more than .5M. Vicp has awarded more than .1 billion for vaccine injuries since 1988. If your child is injured, no amount of money can truly compensate you for losing the bright, happy, healthy child you once had.

In summary
Vaccination is not mandatory. Exemptions are allowed in all states for medical, religious and/or philosophical reasons. As parents, you are the one who is finally responsible for making decisions for your children. You are also the one who has to live with the repercussions of these decisions, not your family pediatrician, nor the government. Fortunately, there are many choices when it comes to vaccination. First, there is the choice to vaccinate or not. If you do pick to vaccinate, you should determined think how many vaccinations you want your child to be given and at what ages.

Recommended Books and Dvd's:
"Vaccines: Are they authentically Safe & Effective?", by Neil Z. Miller, 2002.
"The Vaccine Guide", by Randall Neustaedter, 2002.
"What Your doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccines ", By Stephanie Cave M.D., with Deborah Mitchell, 2001.
"Vaccines - What Cdc Documents and Science Reveal", Dvd, by Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny
"Vaccines: The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices", Dvd, by Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny

References:
(1) Healing the new Childhood Epidemics: Autism, Adhd, Asthma and Allergies by Kenneth Bock, M.D., and Cameron Stauth, 2007, Ballantine Books, New York.
(2) Healing the new Childhood Epidemics: Autism, Adhd, Asthma and Allergies by Kenneth Bock, M.D., and Cameron Stauth, 2007, Ballantine Books, New York.
(3) The Congressional Quarterly, August 25, 2000, pg. 647
(4) David Kessler, Introducing MedWatch: A new advent to reporting medication and gadget adverse ensue and product problems,Journal of American medical Association, July 2, 1993, 269(21): 2765-68.
(5) Zatta Pf, Alfrey Ac. (Eds) Aluminum Toxicity in Infants' condition and Disease. 1997, World Scientific Publishing.
(6) www.fda.gov search for "alumninum toxicity"

Copyright © 2009 Julie Fagan

Vaccination - 5 Things to think Before Vaccinating Your Children

Related : โมเดลกระดาษ ดูการ์ตูน

The Consequences Of Vaccinating Our Children

Pumping poisons into helpless infants' bodies

30-odd jabs in the first 18 months of life! That's how many times the midpoint American child gets vaccinated. Children in the United Kingdom are slightly good off. They get vaccinated only 25 times at this tender age. And to make sure you're well and truly on the vaccination trail early enough, it is mandatory for babies to get nine or more distinct antigens pumped into their youthful immune systems roughly immediately after birth, some of them cocktails of more than one vaccine.

Child Immunization Schedule

The best part for Big Pharma is that most of these vaccinations are backed by law. Children who are not vaccinated as per the Cdc's schedule cannot enter or stay within the formal education system. As if this arm-twisting were not enough, entire populations the world over are brainwashed into believing that they or their children will ageement life-threatening diseases if they do not get vaccinated. And don't we all want the best for our children?

For many decades, prominent scientists and doctors have vehemently promoted the idea that immunization of children is essential to safe them from contracting diseases such as diphtheria, smallpox, polio, cholera, typhoid and malaria. Yet evidence is mounting, showing that immunization may not only be unnecessary but even harmful. Pouring deadly chemicals into a lake doesn't make it immune to pollutants. Likewise, injecting the live poisons contained in vaccines into the bloodstream of children hardly gives time to come generations a chance to lead truly salutary lives.

'Willing' Victims

Children are most vulnerable because their immune systems are roughly defenseless against the poisons in the vaccines. They have a lot going against them since their mothers do not pass on immunity through breast milk because they were vaccinated and no longer make inescapable antibodies.

The fact is that the human immune principles has been designed to safe us from even deadly illnesses but the key here is natural immunity. Vaccines, on the other hand, use synthetic chemicals to build synthetic immunity. They work on the assumption that natural immunity is not good enough.

But could nature have made such a crucial mistake as to make us dependant on injecting foreign, toxic material into our blood when we have an immune principles so complicated and extremely industrialized that millions of sophisticated computers could not imitate its performance? This is rather unlikely.

It is hard to believe then that these chemicals, which comprise animal Dna, bits of weakened viruses, embalming fluid, mercury and other dangerous things are our modern-day life-savers. It is equally surprising that vaccines, which cause serious reactions and have debilitating effects on our health, are meant to stave off invading pathogens, many of which our bodies are designed to deal with simply or are nothing else but helping us to recover from a serious illness such as cancer.

One of the main reasons vaccines are so dangerous is that they have never been tested for protection on human beings; they are only tested on animals. Vaccines cannot be proven safe until they are given to human beings for the first time. But this would turn them into human 'guinea pigs' and it is not inherent to predict what reactions they will have. This is the risk all habitancy receiving vaccines have to take. Some will die, others will live but come to be ill years later, and many others will live without serious long-term consequences. But since all vaccines are designed to cause the very disease they are meant to forestall (to institute immunity), a truly safe vaccine is one that is not effective! Ironic, isn't it?

Under general circumstances, all ingested foods, beverages, etc have to pass through the mucus membranes, the intestinal walls and the liver before they are permitted into such prominent areas as the blood, the heart and the brain. The sudden appearance of a poison in the bloodstream is often met by a counterattack of the immune principles that uses an entire arsenal of antibodies to heal the body from vaccine injuries and forestall death by poisoning. This is called an allergic reaction and in some cases, it could lead to a sudden, sometimes fatal, collapse known as anaphylactic shock.

Among the causes of anaphylactic shock are immunizations for DtaP, Hepatitis B and whooping cough. A young person's immune principles hasn't typically matured adequate to withstand such an onslaught, resulting in what the healing fraternity calls Sudden child Death Syndrome or Sids.

Noted researcher Dr Kenneth Bock points out that vaccinating children may make them hypersensitive to allergies, eczemas and inescapable foods, provoking acute reactions to a host of stimuli that are difficult to pinpoint. Vaccinations may therefore nothing else but be sensitizing children to allergic disorders because the chemicals and genetic material in them change the way the immune principles is meant to function. It becomes skewed with regard to the Th-2 hormone with a relative deficit in Th-1.

Some researchers go so far as to say that contracting some illnesses, such as mumps and measles while childhood, is salutary as they nothing else but bring down the risk of allergies because they strengthen the immune system. Investigate clearly shows that the incidence of asthma and others allergy-related illnesses increases sharply following vaccination.

Fallacy & Fallout

Ever since Louis Pasteur proposed his erroneous germ principles of disease, the scientific preparation has connected a variety of bacteria, viruses and other pathogens to life-threatening illnesses against which pharmaceutical associates have devised an armor of protection in their wee vials.

The question is that despite their claims of success, inescapable vaccines have been consistently connected to definite symptoms and syndromes, some of which continue to baffle scientists and doctors even today. Among the varied diseases that have been correlated to vaccines are persisting fatigue syndrome, autoimmune disorders, studying disabilities, encephalitis, growth inhibition, developmental disorders and hyperactivity.

Some of these issues, such as studying disabilities, were once dismissed as easy problems of growing up. healing researchers now identify them as forms of encephalitis (inflammatory disease of the brain). Here's a shocking statistic: More than 20 percent of American children - one out of five - suffer from these or connected problems.

There is a mounting body of scientific Investigate which shows that persisting diseases such as encephalitis, rheumatoid arthritis, complicated sclerosis, leukemia and other forms of cancer and even Hiv may be provoked by vaccines administered in infancy.

For instance, rheumatoid arthritis, an inflammatory disease of the joints, was once an affliction of the elderly. Now, this crippling disease is widely prevalent among younger habitancy and has been consistently connected with measles and rubella vaccinations.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a serious disease that leads to paralysis, is an additional one syndrome which has been consistently connected with immunizations against measles, diphtheria, influenza, tetanus and the oral polio vaccine. This is hardly surprising when one considers the high toxicity of the vaccines. It is customary that children whose immune systems are already weak perceive more serious complications than those whose constitution and immune systems are much stronger.

Buying Into Myths

It is nearly impossible to evaluation the damage and suffering that has been created and that will occur in time to come as a follow of inadequate facts about the dangers of contemporary immunization programs. Parents want to do what is best for their children and they carry a heavy burden of accountability to keep them salutary and safe. Misinformation can generate essential disagreement in parents because they don't want to neglect their children's condition or cause them any harm.

Vaccine proponents argue that their chemical formulations have not just saved lives; they have also prevented epidemics and all but wiped out some deadly diseases from the face of the earth! This is nothing but a myth. The truth is that the four prominent childhood killer diseases - scarlet fever, pertussis or whooping cough, diphtheria and measles - had already declined by more than 90 percent before vaccines against these diseases were introduced! The hypothesize these diseases vanished was that living conditions such as hygiene, sanitation and standards of living had improved significantly and habitancy increasingly had access to salutary food.

This observation is supported by noted scholars such as Dr Andrew Weil who have researched vaccines. He points out that many serious diseases like cholera, typhoid, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough were on the decline in the last hundred years or so well before vaccines for them were even made.

Another reputed vaccine researcher, Viera Scheibner, points out that prior to 1940, the amount of habitancy perishing from diphtheria in Europe was negligible. But post-1940, when forced vaccinations were carried out on a mass scale against the disease, epidemics of diphtheria followed in individuals who had been fully vaccinated.

The 1940s also saw mass-scale immunization campaigns against whooping cough and tetanus across several countries. These too were followed by outbreaks of the so-called 'provocation poliomyelitis'.

Another question with vaccination is that they are given indiscriminately, regardless of a child's condition status. Many infants don't even get the chance to be salutary later in life because they are pumped full of these poisons against which they are helpless. At this stage of development, a baby has not yet acquired full natural immunity and has wee quality to safe himself or herself.

The Consequences Of Vaccinating Our Children