The Law On Forced Vaccination

One state in single - Massachusetts - has been in focus for its Pandemic Response Act that now allows the governor to sound a state of accident and treat common citizens as terror suspects if they do not submit to forced vaccinations.

Despite the vociferous opposition from civil liberties groups, parents' forums, lawyers, buyer groups and other protesting, concerned and enlightened citizens, the House of Representatives in August 2009 gave the bill a resounding thumbs-up.

Child Immunization Schedule

Never before had any American state allowed the police to intervene in healthcare and vaccination. This legislation outrageously allows the police to forcefully enter people's homes without a warrant, forcefully quarantine residents, remove children from their homes and vaccinate them against their own will and that of their parents, and gives the state's governor the power to impose martial law. Of course, common citizens resisting any such attempts "in the interests of collective health" can be jailed without charges or a trial.

As far as the law is concerned, when a state of pandemic is declared, citizens seem to have itsybitsy choice but to submit to the State or face criminal charges. And the State, as it were, follows the diktats of the Who, which has 194 signatories. This means that potentially, the populations of 194 countries could be subjected to measures such as those adopted in Massachusetts if their respective governments so choose!

These inexplicable measures - dubbed by many as 'Gestapo tactics' - have sparked a consider on what recourse citizens have when confronted by such tyranny. Many adults, parents and others have formed forums that take the anti-vaccination cause to their state's representatives in the hope that persuasive means will convince their political representatives not to use coercive tactics against the population.

However, it's an uphill task when you view mass vaccinations in a historical perspective. The law in favor of mass and forced vaccination dates back to the 19th century, when smallpox was rampant. This evoked a collective backlash even then, with some states deciding to overturn these stringent laws.

The turn of the 19th century saw a landmark case that became the touchstone for all collective health laws in the Us - the Jacobson vs. Massachusetts case. In 1905, the Us supreme Court overturned a plea that forced vaccinations violated the right of every citizen to care for their own health. The court overturned the plaintiff's right in the interest of collective health. The court had thus set the tone for state vaccination laws, and the Federal authorities have since vested with each state the power to make and impose its own personel vaccination legislation.

However, the supreme Court has all the time favorite to preserve the states in discrete lawsuits against forced vaccination, production the citizens' cause that much more difficult. Moreover, each state regularly follows the guidelines of the federal authorities, which in turn corollary the agenda of the Cdc, which in turn is known to be partial to pharmaceutical companies. That's quite assuredly a vicious cycle.

The 1960s ushered in even more stringent legal controls, thanks to whole measles outbreaks. After this, there was no finding back. Vaccine-makers were producing newer and newer vaccines and, ostensibly, vaccines against more and more diseases.

And there it was. Vaccine-makers had found a captive shop for their toxic formulations - children. By whipping up fear in the minds of nervous and ill-informed parents, they along with policy-makers began to push their products through the school agenda, beginning with playschool! It is no surprise that the estimate of vaccines mandated for babies and children has increased over the years.

Each state has its own vaccination laws with regard to what vaccines must be given and at what age and stage during a school-going child's life. And there's no escaping this collective menace unless you select to opt out of the system.

The fact is that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children are forced to withdraw their wards from schools. On the other hand, parents who do not send their children to school violate state truancy laws!

But there are inescapable possession every citizen possesses even in the face of forced vaccination. assuredly there are inescapable rules and regulations that collective health authorities are bound to follow, again within the framework of the law.

Right To Informed Consent: No citizen can be forced to submit to vaccination. He or she must be informed of the inherent risks, complications and side effects related with the vaccine and other advisory material that the health authorities such as the Cdc or Fda have made public. This facts must be made ready to the personel before any vaccine is administered.

The Right to Informed Consent is rooted in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which requires all doctors and other vaccine providers to provide parents written facts about vaccines before their children are vaccinated.

It is this right that citizens and parents, in the case of mass school vaccination drives, are subtly deprived of. The scare-mongering, mass hysteria and psychologically coercive tactics adopted by the powers that be virtually frighten citizen into 'consenting' to being vaccinated. Under these circumstances, citizen are not likely to investigate a vaccine; they are more likely to take 'protective action'.

Exemptions: All 50 American states mandate a vaccination schedule for children seeking admission to discrete levels of school and college. Though the estimate and type of vaccines vary from one state to another, all state-licensed educational institutions have stringent vaccination rules.

But did you know that parents can refuse to submit to coercive diktats on healing grounds? For instance, if your child has a history of adverse reactions to earlier vaccination attempts, you may seek an exemption from additional vaccination on healing grounds.

Different states have dissimilar requirements for applicants. While some states accept a easy written letter from a house physician detailing reasons for healing exemption, others preserve their right to tell the hint and even override it.

The second ground on which an exemption can be obtained is religious as some faiths do not permit vaccination or any type of invasive healing treatment. While some states only broadly define the term 'religious beliefs', others wish the applicant to be a member of a exact religious group of denomination. Again, while some wish a letter of hint from the applicant's spiritual representative, others are more stringent and insist on an affidavit.

Exemption from vaccination based on religious grounds is rooted in the First Amendment of the Us Constitution, which gives every citizen the right to freely practice their religion. To take away this right and impose vaccination, the state must prove a "compelling state interest", which could be the spread of communicable diseases.

Interestingly, religious groups like the Amish who practice this constitutional right don't permit vaccination in their communities and don't have communicable diseases and autistic children. This makes a lot of sense to me. I have never myself received a vaccine, thanks to my mother's great motherly, protective instincts. I have not seen a physician in 38 years, given my healthy, strong immune system, and I have never had the flu in decades.

The third type of exemption is philosophical exemption, which constitutes an individual's personal beliefs that prevent him/her from being vaccinated.

This is the most subjective of the three types of exemptions but allow me to account for what happens when parents get together to mount a carefully and organized exertion to fight for their rights. It may have taken seven long years in Texas and two years in Arkansas but citizens in both these states ultimately won the legal right to practice conscientious, philosophical or religious reliance exemptions to vaccination.

Miffed by this hard-fought victory, state legislators are under increasing pressure from federal health authorities to revoke the exemption. As of 2010, 48 of 50 Us states permit religious exemption while 18 allow a personal, philosophical or conscientious reliance exemption from vaccination.

Of course, it is easier said than done as parents must comply with numerous formalities to seek an exemption, let alone be assuredly granted one. Not surprisingly, more and more citizens are resorting to this category to work their way colse to forced vaccinations. Not surprisingly, it has becoming increasingly difficult to collect exemptions on even healing and religious grounds.

Any which way you look at it, educating yourself on vaccination is the first step to preventing the state from invading your body. As mentioned earlier, all states have vaccination laws but they vary between states. Educate yourself on the laws pertaining to your state so that you can make an informed choice for you and your family. As more and more citizen are waking up to the harmful effects of approved medicine, there are numerous forums and pressure groups which are rallying for the assertion of citizens' rights. Joining one of these forums might be a good idea.

Here is an example of what spending a few minutes on the Internet can reveal. For instance, a easy quest will tell that while the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Cdc propose that the Mmr (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine be given to all children, the law in your state may wish children to be vaccinated against measles and rubella only.

Vaccination is becoming more and more pervasive in discrete aspects of life and may work on crucial choices and decisions in matters of adoption, child custody arrangements during disjunction proceedings, eligibility for health guarnatee and government programs, healing care and immigration.

In a disturbing trend, which additional illustrates the stranglehold of Big Pharma over the government and the healing fraternity, pediatricians have begun to refuse to offer healing treatment to children who have not fulfilled all vaccination requirements under the law.

There have been cases where hospitals have even reported parents to child collective services agencies for their failure or refusal to get their child vaccinated. As outrageous as this may be, it's the bitter truth. Hence, it is more compelling than ever that you educate yourself on the law.

Soldiers: Army personnel, especially new recruits, are a beloved testing ground for vaccine-makers in mass immunization programs. Forces Forces have to submit to all manner of vaccinations in the name of readiness for warfare. Both men and women have itsybitsy choice but to feel endless injections designed to 'protect' them against bio-toxins like smallpox, anthrax, ricin and other diseases.

Several soldiers have died from the often untested chemicals in these experimental vaccines, and others have been rendered severely sick by them. Not unlike women complicated in involuntary ultrasound studies, soldiers have become guinea pigs in weighty drug studies. How else could the pharmaceutical manufactures legally test poisons on human subjects?

Unfortunately, when you're in the armed forces, you have few civilian rights. Soldiers therefore do not have the right to refuse vaccination. Those who do refuse their shots face court martial and prison time, or at the very least, a dishonorable discharge.

Common side effects of the over one million vaccinations so far administered to Us soldiers have included joint pain, extreme fatigue, and memory loss. The anthrax vaccine administered to Gulf War veterans in the 1992 war in the Middle East is one such instance.

However, healing and religious exemptions are allowed but an exemption must be sought before enlisting. Once the recruit enlists with the armed forces, he/she pretty much signs over his/her body to the Us department of Defense which has been accused time and again of human experimentation.

The Law On Forced Vaccination